An article in the Jerusalem Post this morning reporting Bush’s agreement to form an independent commission to investigate faulty Iraq intelligence, i.e., one carefully chosen by him that ignores the past and ‘looks forward’, also includes the following:
On Sunday, Former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter said that the Israeli intelligence community was well aware that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction.
“That’s the only conclusion you can reach,” Ritter said in an interview with Y-Net in Washington. “Israeli intelligence reached it years ago.”
Ariel Sharon should have a problem denying it since this statement in September 2002 essentially verifies he doubted the veracity of at least one claim, which in my mind was one of many alarms ignored, circumvented, or spun by the Bush administration indicating all ‘intelligence’ coming from the U.S. was suspect:
Also from the JP article:
One month earlier, Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee chairman Yuval Steinitz (Likud) formed a subcommittee to investigate Israel’s readiness and the intelligence community’s activities in preparation for the Iraq war.
By December 2003, the subcommittee had not yet submitted a report, and committee member Yossi Sarid (Meretz) demanded a new, more independent subcommittee be formed.
By then, conflicting reports published by a respected Tel Aviv think tank in December indicated deep disagreement over the failure by Israeli intelligence regarding Saddam Hussein’s threat to strike the Jewish state.
One report, penned by veteran IDF intelligence officer Col. (res.) Ephraim Kam, the deputy head of the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, claimed Israeli intelligence was correct in assuming Iraq had the capability and intention of striking Israel during the recent US invasion, if only to play it safe following the previous conflict, in which Israel was hit by 39 Iraqi Scuds with conventional warheads.
The other report, by Brig.-Gen. (res.) Shlomo Brom, claimed Israeli intelligence not only was a “full partner” in the failure to correctly assess Saddam’s capabilities and intentions, but had participated in an “exaggerated assessment” with the Americans and British.
The other report in the news today is this one:
Doesn’t it stand to reason that if Israel fears what this report may contain, they are well aware of human rights violations they should be made to address?
What price the deception?