Thomas Friedman, foreign affairs columnist for The New York Times, can’t be roused from slumber for even one second or one story concerning the 9/11 commission:
Friedman’s NYT‘s colleague Michael Oreskes isn’t in such a hurry to succumb to the big sleep. He remembers what Tom chooses to forget and notices a different pattern emerging:
The record is actually surprisingly clear, that there was a series of moments stretching back from Sept. 11 across at least eight years when more aggressive actions might have produced a different outcome that crisp, blue morning. For example:
In 1997 a commission led by Vice President Al Gore recommended steps to tighten airline security, including tougher screening of passengers and stronger locks on cockpit doors. Civil libertarians and the airline industry resisted.
Osama bin Laden, while hardly a household name, was well known as a threat. (Indeed, this newspaper ran a front-page series about him just as the Bush administration was entering office.)
The World Trade Center was already clearly marked as a target, from the bombing in 1993, and the idea to use planes as missiles was known from a disrupted plot to bring down the Eiffel Tower.
Even if Friedman can continue to ignore evidence that the Bush administration was indeed aware such an attack might occur, that even the messianic Ashcroft quit flying planes due to such intelligence, how is Tom able to convince himself that the Bush administration’s Iraq obsession prior to and following 9/11 is not worthy of even one second of his attention?
There are Afghani women burning for your attention, Mr. Friedman.
Afghan women are setting themselves on fire
Afghanistan’s new constitution affords equal rights to men and women. The warlords, however, do not seem to have noticed. Ismail Khan, the ruler of Herat, has expressed concern over the fiery suicides in his fief. He recently visited survivors in the city’s hospital and commissioned a series of television programmes that seek to dissuade would-be self-immolators. In the meantime, women in Herat are still barred from riding taxis unaccompanied, or from learning to drive.
So which is it? Is Friedman a victim of smoke inhalation or like yet another of his NYT‘s colleagues, doing his job to the best of his abilities, it just doesn’t happen to be that of a journalist?
New York Times Reporter A Government Informant
David Cay Johnston, a celebrated New York Times reporter, reveals in his recent book, Perfectly Legal, his history of acting as a government informant against political dissenters on behalf of his best government sources. Criticized by many for his lack of journalistic integrity, Johnston’s revelations in his book still shock the conscience. Johnston’s informing and propaganda at the behest of favored insiders induced audits, secret surveillance, and criminal prosecutions of select political targets.
Mickey Z has a piece up at Press Action about Friedman’s op-ed I just noticed. Don’t miss it.