Nearly all of the posts on Sudan Watch‘s front page deal with the SLM/A rebels in Darfur. Not only do they reject the peace process but apparently they aren’t too keen on the UN, either:
SLM/A rebels attacking UN and NGO aid workers in N Darfur
Unless rebel attacks against UN and other relief operations in a northern sector of Darfur stop immediately, the UN will be forced to suspend all assistance to 450,000 vulnerable people living in the area until safety can be assured, a top UN official warned today. Snippets from UN News Centre report:
SGSR Jan Pronk called on the rebel SLA to stop attacks on aid workers in Darfur. The UN will hold responsible the armed groups, including those related to the SLA, and their leaders for the failure to assist the extremely vulnerable populations under their control, the UN Mission in Sudan (UNMIS) said in a statement.
Over the past few weeks, aid workers operating for UN agencies and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have come under continuous attacks and harassment by armed groups in the Shangil Tobayi, Tawilla and Kutum areas of North Darfur, with several reports indicating that many of the attacks were waged by SLA factions.
C-Span noted today that the campaign to stop the “genocide” in Darfur is bringing together groups from across the political spectrum. As Angry White Kid notes, the signatories all have political agendas. But it’s not at all surprising to me why they’ve found a common cause in Darfur when regions like the Democratic Republic of Congo never registered a blip on their humanitarian intervention radar screens.
When groups like the SLM/A rebels commit horrific atrocities their religious/political affiliations exonerate them from criticisms, let alone war tribunals, because the people marching on Washington support genocidal acts so long as the people committing them are U.S. friendly and Arab hating.
Hypocrites.