{"id":346,"date":"2004-02-10T10:03:17","date_gmt":"2004-02-10T14:03:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/karmalised.com\/wordpress\/?p=346"},"modified":"2004-02-10T10:03:17","modified_gmt":"2004-02-10T14:03:17","slug":"nyts-calls-for-ethics-committee-investigation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/karmalised.com\/?p=346","title":{"rendered":"NYT&#8217;s Calls For Ethics Committee Investigation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been following this story for a few months now. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rncnotwelcome.org\/media\/111403times.html\"> Here&#8217;s<\/a> a NYT&#8217;s article published November 14, 2003, and for updates I&#8217;ve been relying on the following site.  Today they&#8217;ve sent this:  <\/p>\n<p>Democracy 21 E-News Update  |  February 10, 2004  |  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.democracy21.org \">www.democracy21.org <\/a><br \/>\n_________________________________________________________________<\/p>\n<p>Attached for your information is an editorial from today&#8217;s New York Times calling for a House Ethics Committee investigation of Majority Leader Tom DeLay&#8217;s misuse and exploitation of a tax-exempt charity to finance his political operations at the 2004 Republican convention.  <\/p>\n<p>According to the editorial, &#8220;A real ethics watchdog would retain an independent counsel to investigate Mr. DeLay&#8217;s circumventions, and warn members away from the partying and politicking he has planned in the name of helping children.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The editorial also calls for an Ethics Committee investigation into allegations that bribes were offered to Representative Nick Smith during consideration of the Medicare legislation last fall.<\/p>\n<p>See <a href=\"http:\/\/www.democracy21.org\">www.democracy21.org<\/a> to read a January 28, 2004 letter from Democracy 21 to the House Ethics Committee requesting an investigation into House Majority Leader Delay&#8217;s charity scheme and to read a December 4, 2003 letter from Democracy 21 to the IRS requesting an investigation into DeLay&#8217;s charity&#8217;s tax exempt status.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThe New York Times<br \/>\n&#8220;The Ethics Panel Stirs&#8221;<br \/>\nEditorial<br \/>\nFebruary 10, 2004<\/p>\n<p>The House ethics committee, one of Washington&#8217;s more rubber-toothed watchdogs, will soon hold its first meeting in four months, with Republicans explaining that there simply hasn&#8217;t been much to talk about. That&#8217;s true only if you ignore two major ethics issues that have cropped up in those months. But it&#8217;s not all that surprising that the committee is reluctant to deal with them because one involves last year&#8217;s biggest piece of legislation and the other one of the most powerful members of Congress.<\/p>\n<p>The committee should fully investigate allegations of attempted bribes and intimidation made by Representative Nick Smith, Republican of Michigan, after the infamous long-count vote last November on the Medicare bill. The second item on the committee&#8217;s agenda, harder but more important, should be the seamy scheme by the Republican majority leader, Tom DeLay, to exploit a tax-exempt charitable foundation to underwrite his entertaining, fund-raising and political galas at the G.O.P. convention this summer.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. DeLay, of course, was part of the leadership that bent House standards to keep the 15-minute voting period on the Medicare bill open for almost three hours while members were being frantically whipped into line. Representative Smith, a holdout furious at the arm-twisting, dared to complain publicly that &#8220;bribes and special deals&#8221; had been offered, including &#8220;$100,000-plus&#8221; for the campaign of his son, Brad, who is running to succeed his father, who is retiring. Representative Smith later retreated as calls were heard for a criminal investigation. He insisted that it was &#8220;technically incorrect&#8221; to specify bribes. Rather, he said, an offer of &#8220;substantial and aggressive campaign support&#8221; for his son had come from unidentified colleagues. <\/p>\n<p>Mr. DeLay is raising money for his charity, Celebrations for Children, which is supposed to help abused and neglected children but operates more like Mr. DeLay&#8217;s personal political fund.<\/p>\n<p>A brochure says the organization&#8217;s &#8220;marquee event&#8221; for 2004 will be the Republican National Convention in New York. Promised events include a &#8220;luxury suite&#8221; where wealthy favor-seekers can mingle with congressmen, senators and high-ranking staff members, a golf tournament at Bethpage Black Course, private receptions, dinners, yacht cruises, tickets to Broadway shows &#8220;and more.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The furor over the Medicare vote has at least penetrated the hibernation of the ethics panel, prompting an &#8220;informal fact-finding.&#8221; The panel has a responsibility to surprise the nation, and certainly the House, by producing a thorough accounting of what truly happened. Likewise, the committee cannot honorably ignore Mr. DeLay&#8217;s misuse of a charity to underwrite his own personal and political agenda. A real ethics watchdog would retain an independent counsel to investigate Mr. DeLay&#8217;s circumventions, and warn members away from the partying and politicking he has planned in the name of helping children.<br \/>\n          #           #            #          <\/p>\n<p>For the latest reform news and to access previous reports, releases, and analysis from Democracy 21, visit <a href=\"http:\/\/www.democracy21.org\">www.democracy21.org<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been following this story for a few months now. Here&#8217;s a NYT&#8217;s article published November 14, 2003, and for updates I&#8217;ve been relying on the following site. Today they&#8217;ve sent this: Democracy 21 E-News Update | February 10, 2004 &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/karmalised.com\/?p=346\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-346","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pdXTf-5A","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/karmalised.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/346","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/karmalised.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/karmalised.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/karmalised.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/karmalised.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=346"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/karmalised.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/346\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/karmalised.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=346"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/karmalised.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=346"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/karmalised.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=346"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}