SOMETHING FOR THE MEDIA TO THINK ABOUT
A mob of about a hundred people arrived at my house at 11 this morning (Sunday, October 31, 2010.) They broke through the gate and vandalized property. They shouted slogans against me for my views on Kashmir, and threatened to teach me a lesson. The OB Vans of NDTV, Times Now and News 24 were already in place ostensibly to cover the event live. TV reports say that the mob consisted largely of members of the BJP’s Mahila Morcha (Women’s wing). After they left, the police advised us to let them know if in future we saw any OB vans hanging around the neighborhood because they said that was an indication that a mob was on its way. In June this year, after a false report in the papers by Press Trust of India (PTI) two men on motorcycles tried to stone the windows of my home. They too were accompanied by TV cameramen.
What is the nature of the agreement between these sections of the media and mobs and criminals in search of spectacle? Does the media which positions itself at the “scene” in advance have a guarantee that the attacks and demonstrations will be non-violent? What happens if there is criminal trespass (as there was today) or even something worse? Does the media then become accessory to the crime? This question is important, given that some TV channels and newspapers are in the process of brazenly inciting mob anger against me. In the race for sensationalism the line between reporting news and manufacturing news is becoming blurred. So what if a few people have to be sacrificed at the altar of TRP ratings? The Government has indicated that it does not intend to go ahead with the charges of sedition against me and the other speakers at a recent seminar on Azadi for Kashmir. So the task of punishing me for my views seems to have been taken on by right wing storm troopers. The Bajrang Dal and the RSS have openly announced that they are going to “fix” me with all the means at their disposal including filing cases against me all over the country. The whole country has seen what they are capable of doing, the extent to which they are capable of going. So, while the Government is showing a degree of maturity, are sections of the media and the infrastructure of democracy being rented out to those who believe in mob justice? I can understand that the BJP’s Mahila Morcha is using me to distract attention the from the senior RSS activist Indresh Kumar who has recently been named in the CBI charge-sheet for the bomb blast in Ajmer Sharif in which several people were killed and many injured. But why are sections of the mainstream media doing the same? Is a writer with unpopular views more dangerous than a suspect in a bomb blast? Or is it a question of ideological alignment?
Arundhati Roy
October 31, 2010
It is extremely distressing to hear of this attack on Arundhati Roy’s house. By my idea of the TRP-addicted media, I wouldn’t be surprised if it is, to an extent, media-orchestrated. What it signifies, is brought out well in her statement itself. What I would like to add is that the big corporate media too has a serious stake in silencing (or rather terrorising into silence) the critical voices of sanity and conscience that Ms Roy so brilliantly represents. So what if an uncomfortably large section of the Indian populace is reeling under poverty, humiliation and injustice, the Shining India of our rulers’ dream still provides the global market with a numerically huge consumer class. Ms Roy, to the big media’s chagrin, is a huge spanner in the works. But the sane section of the privileged people, including the Roy-bashing-jingoist media, would do well to spare a thought to what ends would be achieved if the likes of Ms Roy is really silenced? Wouldn’t the resultant intellectual poverty feed the desperation of the extant material poverty and deprivation of the majority of Indians into a more violent catharsis? I wish people paid more attention to what Arundhati Roy has been saying over the years. It might still help to save our future for us.