chomsky on debate strategy

As’ad AbuKhalil follows-up on a post that ignited a lively debate amongst his readers over Chomsky’s use of Israeli-only sources in his Harvard debate with Alan Dershowitz. A few commenters wander into economic territory that would be ever more interesting if Kevin Carson happens into it. As’ad has not yet spelt out his objections to the Geneva Accords, described by Chomsky as a good starting point, or words to that effect. It seems to me there would be worse starting points than the GA, the obstacle to any such point being one partner is actively engaged in making sure the other party is erroneously maligned out of its partner status. But As’ad leaves little to debate in his review of Munich in which he provides the background story missing from Spielberg’s film and the obscure details to go with it as only he can tell it.